| Intensity of Importance |
Definition |
Explanation |
|
1 |
Equal importance |
Two activities contribute equally to the objective |
|
3 |
Moderate importance |
Experience and judgment slightly favor one activity over another |
|
5 |
Strong importance |
Experience and judgment strongly favor one activity over another |
|
7 |
Very strong or demonstrated importance |
An activity is favorad very strongly over another; its dominance demonstrated in practice |
|
9 |
Extreme importance |
The evidence favoring one activity over another is of the highest possible order of affirmation |
|
2,4,6,8 |
Intermediate values |
|
With 3 treatment options to be compared (RxA, RxB, RxC), we can make subjective comparison judgments on which option we like best, as with the following:
RxA |
|
RxB |
RxA |
|
RxC |
RxB |
|
RxC |
Thus we have rated RxB better than RxA, RxA better than RxC, and RxB better than RxC. When we put these scores in the matrix, the diagonal is always 1. We fill in the top triangle of the matrix as shown below on the left matrix, Figure 1. To complete the full matrix we use the reciprocal values of the upper diagonal. The full, completed matrix is seen on the right side below, Figure 2.
Figure 1. Half of the matrix based on paired comparisons |
|
Figure 2. Full matrix based on paired comparisons |
|
|
|
| Random Consistency Index - RI - (for number of items compared in a matrix) | ||||||||||||||||||
| n | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | |||||||||
| RI | 0.00 | 0.58 | 0.9 | 1.12 | 1.24 | 1.32 | 1.41 | 1.45 | 1.51 | |||||||||
|
Teknomo,
Kardi. Analytic Hierarchy Process Tutorial. Website -
http://people.revoledu.com/kardi/tutorial/AHP
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Saaty,
T.J. How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process. European Journal
of Operational Research, 1990, 48: 9-26.
|
|||||||||||||||